I consider myself an advocate of systems and structures, just for the sake of reproducibility and reliability of processes that delivers Value.
Not just that, it’s a matter of putting something to work (ideation, design, implementation, scale, repeat) with the capacity to solve problems and improve our world.
Context drive reality, and context is the convergence of a set of interest that interact and collide in Chaos dynamic. Thankful for that, it means we will always have fun 😃.
However, frameworks and structures are “Means” not “Ends”. Clarity on that must help to avoid sanctify systems performance that aren’t adding Value. This is the true disease I’m trying to bring home.
Systems Design have tons of moving parts, nonetheless is just that, nodes which can be move around (at a cost!!). So, looking around for frameworks and structures that don’t match context is a waste of resources with huge opportunity costs.
In a nutshell, “let first understand context, then the problem at hand. Lastly, look for frameworks that could guide the problem solving. Not so sure if the other way around generate Value”.